[Politics]
[politics] Delusions of truth
I’ve commented before on the explicitly post-truth campaign that Mitt Romney is running. He frequently makes statements that are either untrue on the plain face of the facts (“President Barack Obama has not signed one new free-trade agreement in the past four years.“), or are flatly contradictory to his own statements, often within the same news cycle (“There’s no legislation with regards to abortion that I’m familiar with that would become part of my agenda.”). These lies get very little play in the mainstream media and none in the conservative commentariat, and apparently suit their purpose very well in appealing to specific audiences Romney is trying to address. His running mate, Paul Ryan, has a similarly elastic relationship with truth and ethics.
I’ve assumed all along this is typical political manipulation, the deeply cynical approach pioneered in its modern form by Lee Atwater and Roger Ailes largely to get the GOP past the political disaster that was Richard Nixon, then perfected by Karl Rove, and maintained on a daily basis by FOX News (which has in the past explicitly sued to protect their right to lie on First Amendment grounds).
However, I am realizing with dawning horror that it’s quite possible that Romney actually believes whatever he’s saying, whenever he’s saying it. That this isn’t cynical opportunism, but an actual detachment from reality. A cognitive issue, or perhaps indescribably terribly judgment.
Certainly over the past decade or so, the conservative movement has made a concerted and self-conscious effort to opt out of the reality-based community. Many American conservatives have convinced themselves that when the facts disagree with their ideology, the facts have been biased or distorted by liberal sources. That’s the relentless daily message of FOX News, for example. And that thinking lies behind everything from evolution denial to climate change denial to supply side economics — all cherished conservative positions with no objective basis in the real world.
When as the conservative movement has done, you demonize and disparage intellectual achievement and the validity of real world data and experience, intellectual consistency really does stop being a concern.
We know from Romney’s own words that he believes things which are incomprehensible to almost all of the rest of us. When he told unemployed Florida voters, ““I should tell my story. … I’m also unemployed,” Romney was equating the experience of having a quarter billion dollars of net worth with being out of work and unable to pay his bills. Or Ann Romney’s comments about their struggles in the early years of their marriage, ““They were not easy years. […] Neither one of us had a job, because Mitt had enough of an investment from stock that we could sell off a little at a time.”
The Romneys are people who believe their experiences of unemployment and financial struggle connect them with everyday Americans. And they seem genuinely offended when others don’t accept that self-assessment. In this, they both are hideously detached from reality. And it’s only small example of what seems to go on in Romney’s mind.
This doesn’t precisely qualify Mitt to be president.
I’m starting to be far more frightened by the idea that Romney believes his own words than I ever was by the callow cynicism I’d assumed in him up until now. Admittedly, the nation will survive his presidency if elected. We survived the charismatically veneered Alzheimer’s of Ronald Reagan, and we survived the dry drunk, entitled incompetence of George W. Bush, after all. But the idea that anyone takes this man with his shallow, inconsistent ideology and cognitively fractured worldview seriously is just frightening. The idea that tens of millions of my fellow citizens take him seriously is just depressing.
We really do get the government we deserve.
Related Posts
Posted: 5:59 am Tue October 16 2012 |
Comments
« [events] Went to the SFWA Northwest Reading Series last night | [links] Link salad has binders full of women »

[politics] Delusions of truth http://t.co/Q9xuCgmS (via @jay_lake)
Jay Lake: [politics] Delusions of truth http://t.co/BnfvCCro
Jay Lake: [politics] Delusions of truth: I’ve commented before on the explicitly post-truth campaign that Mitt R… http://t.co/76rtoptW
[politics] Delusions of truth: I’ve commented before on the explicitly post-truth campaign that Mitt Romney is r… http://t.co/zJfceXln
I think your medications may be interfering with your cognitive abilities to recognize the truth when it is told. One example is your accusation that Romney lied about the trade deals…in fact he told the truth. Mr. Obama had not instigated one new trade deal. In fact, he was against the ones he signed when campaigning in 2008. If you don’t believe me maybe you will believe the liberal “bible” – The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/business/trade-bills-near-final-chapter.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Most sincerely,
PA
It is malarkey. Bush “instigated” deals with Columbia, South Korea and Panama, but they flopped. They went to Congress and they died there.
Obama criticized the old agreements when he was campaigning in 2008. So he changed them. He “instigated” new agreements with all three countries, negotiated them successfully and put them through Congress successfully.
Maybe Romney is right on the legalistic definition of “instigate” but he is wrong on the practical reality.
And it is asinine to play the medication card in a political debate. Jay has said the chemo affects his energy and his emotional state, but he has never said it interferes with his ability to tell truth from malarkey.
Suggesting that Jay is “hopped up on goofballs” in effect, is offensive, isn’t it? He provided links to support his points. You’re parsing details when Romney is certainly obfuscating and misleading voters. You’re clearly biased and part of the problem, and insulting to boot. You’re the kind of person Jay is talking about, and you’re screwed up as any clueless conservative. Try harder for your own sake. Are you on drugs, or seeing a shrink? I have to assume so.
Calling out the delusions.
I don’t know if the nation would survive a Romney presidency or not. I am convinced that most or all of the New Deal, not to mention Planned Parenthood and Roe v. Wade, wouldn’t. I think if given a chance, Romney and Ryan would change this country into something beyond recognition.
Jay Lake comments on Mitt Romney http://t.co/44pcSIGM #fb