[Culture, Personal]
[personal||culture] The costs of owning a car
I hold an Oregon drivers license. I own an automobile. I belong to the American Automobile Association. That makes me part of car culture in this country. In accepting the perceived benefits of owning a car, I am also taking a responsibility for the risks and social costs of widespread automobile use.
There are over 250,000,000 registered passenger vehicles in the United States.1 There are over 210,000,000 licensed drivers in the United States.2 We are almost all of us in his country part of car culture. Almost all of us take responsibility for the risks and social costs of widespread automobile use.
As it happens, for my personal lifestyle, though I am low-mileage driver by US standards, mostly due to having a job working at home and thus no daily commute (we’re ignoring the effects of cancer on my driving for the sake of this discussion), I and my household are not in a position to go car-free. The location of Nuevo Rancho Lake is such that many of life’s needed errands are impractical without an automobile. We do not live in a transit-dense area, and the time penalty for taking such mass transit as is available overwhelms our schedules.
For my own part, when
the_child
This means I am benefiting from automobiles, even if I no longer operate them personally for reasons of my own health and everyone’s safety. In benefiting from them, I accepting their costs. Like any aspect of life, car culture is both things, benefits and costs.
I accept that in the United States, we experience about 30,000 deaths per year (10.3876 per 100,000 population)3. (Oddly enough, this is very similar to the number of gun deaths per year.) That number is down about 25% over the last ten years, apparently mostly due to safety improvements in automobile design and construction. In opting to own and use a car, I am participating in a system which kills 30,000 of my fellow citizens every year. I own a piece of those deaths as surely as if I were driving the car that killed them. To pretend otherwise would be disingenuous of me. The moral calculus here isn’t “ooh, killing machines!”, but rather a balance of the overall social benefit of nearly universal transportation with the carrying costs of its risks and inefficiencies. Every one of those 30,000 dead set out with some purpose, most of them by car, that they judged to be worth the risk to their life. Just I like judge ever car trip I make to be worth the risk to my life. That 0.01% risk of my death on that particular trip is the cost of doing business.
I also accept that in the United States, the average passenger vehicle emits 108 pounds of hydrocarbons, 854 pounds of carbon monoxide, 55.8 pounds of oxides on nitrogen, 16,034 pounds of carbon dioxide, and 813 gallons of gasoline evaporates.4 (I’m not sure about that last number, but I’m not in a position right now to research it further. The rest meet a test-of-reasonableness for me, but if someone has better data, let me know.) Again, by participating in car culture, I own a piece of that pollution as surely as if I were dumping industrial chemicals into the air by hand for the sheer joy of seeing the birds fall out of the sky. Again, a balance of social benefits and net risk. One that is highly arguable, of course, but every day 200,000,000 million of us get in our cars and pump out those tailpipe emissions. This is of course changing with the increasing emphasis on hybrids and more efficient conventional engines, as well as be affected by other choices such as mass transit or bicycle use. But that massive scale of pollution is the cost of doing business.
As I said, I belong to AAA. That’s an organization which among other things lobbies for motorists’ concerns and increased government support for car culture. I am responsible for the things they promote and achieve, whether or not I personally agree with choices to, say, fund a new highway and not build a light rail system somewhere with that same money. I own that, it’s part of car culture.
I’m not even talking about many other costs of the automobile, from the way Federal and State budgets are skewed toward road infrastructure to the impact of fossil fuel extraction and distribution to the foreign wars we have fought over access to oil to the misplaced research and development dollars that could have improved our way out all of this decades ago if it were not for car culture. Those are all part of the cost of doing business.
The point I’m making is that in choosing to own and use an automobile, in choosing to participate in car culture, all of these things belong to me. The deaths, the pollution, the foreign wars, the misplaced spending. And I accept them as part of the cost of doing business, given the benefits I perceive the automobile giving me. I would be a moral coward not to do so. I would be in denial. If I didn’t take that responsibility, I’d be accepting the emotional and personal rewards of automobile ownership without acknowledging any of the costs.
How this applies to handgun licensing, gun ownership and NRA membership is best left as an exercise for the reader. I will simply say that we are all responsible for the consequences of our beliefs. We live in a society that will barely acknowledge the cost of widespread private automobile ownership, while pretending that widespread private gun ownership is some holy right without consequence at all.
Bullshit. My belief that I should own a car places responsibility on me for death, pollution and numerous other social costs. Your belief that you should own a gun is no more free of such costs.
Related Posts
Posted: 6:58 am Thu December 13 2012 |
Comments
« [cancer] The latest questions for my oncologist | [links] Link salad basks in the glory of cytotoxic drugs »

[personal||culture] The costs of owning a car http://t.co/OjBCglTA (via @jay_lake)
Jay Lake: [personal||culture] The costs of owning a car: I hold an Oregon drivers license. I own an automobile. … http://t.co/VHLfY5bw
Jay Lake: [personal||culture] The costs of owning a car http://t.co/BeAz42P6
Brilliant and true. RT @jay_lake [personal||culture] The costs of owning a car: http://t.co/HFJPSBEt
Acknowledgement from both car and gun owners is the first step. What do you propose after that for each? I see on the auto side there are already mechanisms in place in regards to the govt. being able to regulate vehicles and their manufacture. (MPG standards/safety standards/etc.) What would you propose as reasonable steps that could be taken in regards to regulating gun ownership that are not already being taken? What argument can you put forth to answer the challenge that regulating guns is the first step to taking them away?
Off the top of my head, universal licensing for gun owners and universal registration for firearms — exactly like automobiles. Also, closing the ludicrous gun show exemption for background checks, restoring the assault weapons ban, and placing limits on magazine size. We regulate cars without taking them away, surely we can regulate guns without taking them away.
[personal||culture] The costs of owning a car: I hold an Oregon drivers license. I own an automobile. I belong t… http://t.co/boR8EsZD
My daughter graduated from college, and is working (without pay) as an actor while making a living as a waitress. This means, she is really living below the poverty level, as is most everyone in her age group. Participating vicariously in her life, the true impact of wage gaps, and the costs of housing and cars become alarmingly apparent. For the summer, she was working in San Francisco, which has a serviceable, but poor transportation system. Timing was unreliable, late night travel risky, and the most impactful realization was that a 15 min. car trip turned into a 75 minute public transport journey. She is not in Atlanta, where public transport is virtually non-existent. The true cost of car ownership is exorbitant, and the lack of a public option makes life below middle class extremely challenging.