[Links]
[links] Link salad goes back to work
Why you should probably stop eating wheat — Unfortunately for me, soft white carbs is about all I can tolerate during much of the chemo sequence.
Swamp Pop — Because we all need new music every now and then. (Via Daily Idioms, Annotated.)
Life Up Close: The Year’s Best Microscope Views of Biology — Cool stuff!
Overview — A brief documentary on the psychological and emotional experience of seeing the Earth from space. (Via David Goldman.)
By Hiring Kurzweil, Google Just Killed the Singularity — Hmmm.
“It’s a big bad scary world out there!” Are you sure North America? — Another foreign take on the USAnian culture of fear, violence and guns. (Via
goulo
NRA goes silent after Connecticut school shooting — This is very strange. Normally the NRA is all about lecturing us regarding theoretical defense of essential liberties, home defense, and watering the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants and children. I find it literally inconceivable they have discovered a conscience after all these years, so I wonder what’s up.
?otD: Work today, or something else?
12/18/2012
Writing time yesterday: 0.0 hours (chemo brain)
Hours slept: 11.5 hours (9.5 hours fitful, 2.0 hours napping)
Body movement: 0.5 hours (30 minutes on the stationary bike)
Weight: 214.4
Number of FEMA troops on my block confiscating firearms and shutting down the Internet: 0
Currently reading: The Hydrogen Sonata by Iain M. Banks
Related Posts
Posted: 6:24 am Tue December 18 2012 |
Comments
« [cancer] A bit more on series three, session six | [photos] Your Tuesday moment of zen »

I totally agree with the guy from Ireland about the culture of fear in the US. It’s probably not as notable, if you are exposed to that sort of thing all the time, but it is very notable from the outside. And like the poster, I’ve also found the US scarier in some parts than most other countries I’ve visited.
As for the iO9 article, they can pry my wheat and my carbohydrates from my cold dead fingers, to quote the NRA. Apart from genuine celiacs – which are rare – wheat is a perfectly normal and healthy food. And I’m getting very sick of the American war on wheat and carbohydrates and the resultant rise of gluten free products – not diet products, but regular stuff, especially since the substances used to replace gluten are usually stuff I cannot eat. Unless you have celiac disease – and if you do, you’ll know – there is no reason to eat gluten free. It’s a fad diet, nothing more. That’s something else that the Irish guy forgot to mention in his post – the extreme American faith in nutritionists and fad diets. Just look at the uproar about changing the bloody food pyramid, whereas no one outside the US ever cares about such things as food pyramids. I think the only place I ever saw the food pyramid was on the back of a Kellogs cereal box.
What helps is making an effort to eat a balanced diet, don’t eat too much processed food and additive laden stuff and cut down on sugary softdrinks.
Besides, every person’s metabolism is different. I have always had problems metabolizing proteins and fats. It was much worse when I was a child and couldn’t eat any meat, eggs, diary and overly fatty foods at all. It got better as I grew older and I now drink milk, eat eggs and meat, though I’m still careful about meat, eggs and fat. Meanwhile, I never had any problems with nuts, shellfish (seafood was the only protein I could eat as a kid), wheat and carbohydrates, which goes completely against the grain of current US nutritionist wisdom.
So if wheat and carbohydrates the only thing your chemo-stressed body can digest right now, then forget the nutritionists and iO9 (I really wish they would keep out of science topics at all, since they always do it badly) and eat what you feel comfortable with.
Sorry about the rant, but the anti-wheat and anti-carbohydrate lobby in the US makes me mad, because the foods they combat are the very foods that keep me happy and healthy. Why don’t they fight against bacon and gelantine for a change?
Answer of the day: Yup, but farely relaxed so far.
I strongly suspect that the NRA is remaining quiet because they can tell this time was different. People react differently to the murder of 20 small children. People don’t want their children around guns, and so the usual “We should arm everyone!” response will not be received the same way. A couple of people said crap like that and were roundly castigated. Even the NRA can understand what it means when the canaries die in the mines.
If they say anything too soon, it will create massive reactionary blowback. By keeping mum, they don’t give people something to point at and go after.