Sign up for my newsletter to be among the first to learn of upcoming titles!

[cancer] The sexuality of cancer

I’ve talked about almost every aspect of my cancer experience over the past 18 months or so since my excellent cancer adventure first began. The sole, and somewhat notable exception, has been the effects on my libido and sexual function. Those are critical issues, both to quality of life and to self-image. So, with a somewhat reddened face, I continue my ongoing efforts at clarity and honesty, this time in a subject where tact is improbable, and the silence is deafening.

One of the disclosures in the pre-op consent process for last year’s surgery (partial colectomy, open incision) was centered around the risks of resultant sexual dysfunction. Options ranged from transient or persistent erectile dysfunction to complete loss of ability to orgasm. (Also including, oddly, internal orgasms wherein I would experience the hormonal and physical aspects of orgasm, but without ejaculate, which I believe flows into the bladder in such cases.) Much of this was a result of the proximity of the vagus nerve to the surgical site, but also the proximity of my genitalia themselves.

I had a lengthy discussion of the issue at the time with the two surgeons, but it revolved around, “oh, well” because the alternatives to surgery ranged from the ridiculous to the fatal. As it happens, I’ve never been especially orgasm-focused as a lover, beyond the baseline desire for such lovely sensations, because the processes of sex are at least as fascinating to me as the outcomes, so I figured I was ready for this.

Post-operatively, nothing worked for a long time. This was expected — pain, anaesthesia, opiates, surgical healing: these things are not a recipe for happy sexual functionality. I was able to orgasm intermittently within a month of surgery, but erectile dysfunction was a significant issue. The doctors told me to wait six months and see if I recovered pre-operative functionality.

As will come as a surprise to absolutely no one who’s spent any time with me in person, I’m highly libidinous and powerfully sex-positive. Combine that with my essential sensualism and my strong novelty seeking behaviors, and you can see where my passions often take me. By two months after surgery, I was sexually active again. Things were pretty scrambled in terms of erectile function, but imagination, creativity and a thoughtful partner can make up for a lot of that. I have been and continue to be blessed with an abundance of all three. At six months, however, I was still experiencing consistent (but not absolute) erectile dysfunction. So I sought pharmaceutical assistance (names abbreviated to cut down on spam bait).

C—, as it happens, does absolutely nothing for me. I might as well be taking sugar pills. V— does not work precisely as advertised, but does in fact restore me to reasonable function for up to 48 hours or so, with full performance at expected intervals. My doctor wrote me a scrip for 20 V— a month, which would keep me pretty well supplied even on my busiest times, but my insurance carrier will only cover 5 per month. I can go out of pocket for the rest of the scrip, but it’s damned expensive, about $17 per pill. (Even the covered cost nets out to $10 per pill, due to the stupid limitation on the number — a $50 co-pay regardless of the quantity.) This carrier will pay $100,000s unblinking for my cancer care, but won’t cover a few $100 per month for restoration of my baseline quality of life.

I’ve been arguing with them all year. My final appeal recently ran out. My assertion that the standard of care should include restoring my quality of life is running up against an apparently puritanical view that no one needs to have sex more than five days a month. Not to put too fine a point on it, but and I enjoy each other’s company very much, as often as possible. And that’s not even taking into account other lifestyle opportunities.

So while I can indulge my passions and the passions of my partners freely, I cannot indulge them fully. This has been intensely frustrating, and more than a little irritating. In trying to wean myself from V—, I’ve had modest but not significant success. It’s clearly in part psychological, because some situations will stimulate me far more than others. And we’ve managed to avoid getting into a cycle of denial, blame or guilt over my various failures in this department. But at the same time, sex has become a consistently touchy issue in ways it rarely was before the cancer.

Now I’m looking at new surgery, albeit much less severe than last year’s as we do not expect open incision. Lighter anaethesia, much simpler surgical healing, nothing near the vagus nerve or my genitalia. Still, there’s a decent sized lacuna in my sexual life coming up. Then the chemo I’m most likely to undergo will give me heavy metal poisoning (this is apparently a feature, not a bug) which will repress my libido and further impair my already chancy physical responses, and generate a huge gap, lasting more than half a year.

I don’t talk about my sex life here on the blog, largely for reasons of the confidentiality of others, but I am a highly sexual being. Sex is a big part of my identity, a major passion of my heart, and significant pursuit into which I’ve put a lot of effort at becoming both good and fulfilling. Sex is almost as much fun as writing, and a damned sight more fun than pretty much anything else I do.

The blindly ravening beast that is cancer has stolen that away from me, in shreds and slices, and my insurance company has conspired with the cancer to keep me from being fully restored to myself. Now this second round is stealing even more of my sexuality. I resent this deeply, and find myself terribly frustrated.

As with all of it, I will march forward, because I have no alternatives. and all those close to me are being beautifully supportive, and I know that will continue. I just hate giving up any more of my sexuality. On the bad days, it feels as if I’m compromising my life away, one small surrender at a time.

On the good days, I still love, and make love, as madly passionate as ever I have.

Still, fuck cancer.

[links] Link salad celebrates September morn

The Outer Alliance Pride Day posts begin — I joined the Outer Alliance, not because my sexuality is queer (my Kinsey rating is damned near a negative number) but because I believe in what the Outer Alliance is trying to do: create and maintain normative visibility for the entire spectrum of sexuality and gender identity. It’s not that I think we should be queer-indifferent, any more than I think we should be color-indifferent or gender-indifferent — but those are aspects of identity, not criteria for judgment or prejudgment. So, in my own small heteronormative, white guy way, I participate, starting here.

is less than impressed with some of my work — For one, Escapement Powell’s | Amazon | Barnes & Noble | Borders ].

The Academy of New World Historians goes viral with some nifty extratextual support for her books.

The First Step Is to Admit You Have a Problem — Scott Cupp at SF Signal on his overwhelming love affair with books.

One last crack at the Google Books settlement [ jlake.com | LiveJournal ]

Hachette chief hits out at e-books — French publishing CEO on how e-books will destroy the print book business. Hmm. (From a mailing list I’m on.)

Hands-free shopping — Invisible Hand, anyone? Neat concept, profoundly ripe for abuse.

Iron Age Butter Discovered in IrelandThe butter has turned white and is now adipocere, a kind of wax.Adipocere” is also known as “grave wax”, which is second only to “coffin liquor” as my favorite weird postmortem detail. Mmm, saponification. (Via , here.)

Arctic summers ice-free ‘by 2013’ — Rush Limbaugh to Ice Station Zebra, stat. That liberal bias to reality is showing again.

The poor and the dark skinned have more babies than the rich and the light skinned — And other canards of the paranoid Right. (Thanks to .)

Defending America from terrorism — More on the conservative mindset. No thanks, I’ll take the reality based community every time.

Tea Bagger Rhetoric in American History — Worth reading, whether or not you take the Republican rhetoric about the dangers of healthcare reform at face value. A nice reminder of how often those “end of the American way of life” jeremiads have been used, and how wrong they’ve been every time.

?otD: How much is that Doogie in the window?


9/1/2009
Body movement: 5 minutes of mediation, 30 minute stationary bike ride
Hours slept: 6.25
This morning’s weigh-in: 230.2
Currently reading: The Real Wizard of Oz by Rebecca Loncraine; Acacia by David Anthony Durham